air_n_darkness (
air_n_darkness) wrote2006-08-22 10:47 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Short Post...
Okay, okay...SciFi is canning Stargate:Sg-1. But they're not canning the franchise, for gods sake! Atlantis has been renewed, and all the people behind the franchise have stated that there are plans for Stargate, beyond the end of the TV series! C'mon people, chill! The show's been running for 10 SEASONS, a major accomplishment for a non-mainstream sci-fi franchise. Quality has been slipping over the past two "extra" seasons; it's time to let the show go to a different level. Big screen, mini-series, spin-off's...whatever.
Will I miss it as part of my SciFi Friday line-up? Yeah. But know I will not jump on you "Save Our Show" bandwagon. Just because I'm a member of many Stargate comms does not mean I want to be spammed with petitions and "support icons." So BTFO! It's TV people! Deal!
Will I miss it as part of my SciFi Friday line-up? Yeah. But know I will not jump on you "Save Our Show" bandwagon. Just because I'm a member of many Stargate comms does not mean I want to be spammed with petitions and "support icons." So BTFO! It's TV people! Deal!
no subject
The "support icons" are bad enough, but it's the fan-websites (like "Firefly Season 2") that really kill me. Christ, get over iot, it's a TV show, and it's gone. Hey, I love Firefly, too, but let it go. Appreciate that it died before it got bogged down and stupid.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
In that it's a hell of a lot easier to go "OK, why not, we'll make more" and not worry about it when the show in question is animated (meaning you don't have to renegotiate contracts/deal with egos/have actors want to go do other things) and basically silly and episodic (meaning you can keep the taglines and running jokes and writing new shows isn't that hard as opposed to making a whole new 13-episode season/storyline full of intrigue, plot twists, and backstory).
no subject
Yes you do. Contract renegotiations almost broke down and almost caused the Simpsons' run to end a couple times. Animated shows have actors too, and voice actors can be harder to replace than regular actors (Futurama went out and resigned all the original voice actors to reprise their roles *before* announcing the show's return).
I think you're making a few broad generalizations about cartoon shows. Yes, many (not all) are episodic and many (not all) are silly, but I don't think it's fair to assume that it's easier to produce a self-contained story in one episode than it is to drag the story out over a whole season. And since the visual portion of cartoons often have to be produced frame-by-frame, there are difficulties that live-action shows don't ever have to consider.
no subject
no subject
Well, I still stand by what I said. But possible. Likely, even.
my two cents (again)
Also, your examples are self-contained episodes; if they have one poor ratings week or get a couple of bad reviews on an episode, execs might overlook it. If a long running, storyline-driven show takes has too many lackluster episodes, fans WILL drop off- which is exactly what has been happening for the past two seasons.
SG-1 has had 10 seasons to become more than the mid-quality movie that spawned it *fanboys/girls scream HERESY!* It's our generations Star Trek, IMO,- 'cause really, the classic Trek was pretty awful. *irate fans are now sharpening pitchforks*
My point being that there's no need to "save our show." It isn't dying in some back alley somewhere. I would much rather they pull the plug now, before it gets any worse, then let it become completely unwatchable.
Re: my two cents (again)
It also draws attention to another big difference; Futurama was only on for four seasons, and was NOT canceled due to lack of ratings; it was more because Fox wanted more control than Matt Groening was willing to give up. That's why it's being resurrected on cable (Cartoon Network? Comedy Central? Not sure). It's done well in cable reruns, and the DVD collections have sold very well. That was the main reason I DID agree with the fan-driven "Get Futurama back" campaign: because it was a good show that still had a lot more good stuff in it, and was even still getting better when it got canned. (I can't say what the deal was with Family Guy, mainly because I thought it was a terrible show and didn't watch it much.)
But there definitely is a point past which a show shouldn't be resurrected. I think that's why there weren't huge uproars when things like X-Files or Buffy were canceled; they'd already jumped the shark.